Abstract:
This study aimed to assess the efficiency of the artificial insemination service and its major
constraints from December 2022 to January 2024 in the three selected districts of West Wallaga
Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. The study was conducted using both cross-sectional and
retrospective study designs with multi-stage sampling techniques. A cross-sectional study was
employed via structured questionnaires to collect data from 246 respondents (201 AI
beneficiaries, 9 AITs, and 36 AHPs). Moreover, the retrospective study was conducted using the
recorded data of AI services covering the years 2019 to 2022 at animal health clinics of
respective districts. Data analysis was carried out by the JMP pro.17 version software package,
and this study showed that of 201 dairy cattle owners, only 51(25.37%) respondents get regular
AI services and are satisfied with the overall services, while the majority 150 (74.63%) do not
get regular AI services due to shortage of AI inputs (42%), shortage of AI technicians (36.67%),
and unavailability of services on weekends and holidays (21.33%), which shows statistically
significant differences (P-value = 0.0405) among districts. Of the total dairy cattle owners who
are not receiving AI services regularly, 39.33% use natural mating, and the rest (60.67%)
postpone the time of insemination for the next heat cycle when the AI service is not available.
The identified most common challenges of AI services were conception failure (21.43%), lack
of AI services in the vicinity (18.13%), heat detection problems (17%), shortage of AI
technicians (16.5%), poor awareness creation of the farmers (12.64%), shortage of AI service
inputs (7.7%), and insufficient support from the concerned bodies (6.6%) that shows no
statistically significant differences (X2 = 9.448; p-value = 0.8844) among the three selected
districts. The reproductive performance of dairy cows were AFS (45.38±0.16, and 32.09±0.26
months), AFC (54.87±0.18, and 41.56±0.26 months), DO (197.11±2.13, and 143.64±3.03 days),
CI (16.03±0.07, and 14.25±0.1 months), and NSPC (2.08±0.05, and 1.92±0.07 times) for local,
and crossbreed cows respectively and these reproductive performances were affected by feed
shortage (34.82%), diseases (22.39%), poor reproductive performance of local cows (21.89%),
and overall poor management of cows (20.9%). In the record study, conceivability and delivery
of the artificially inseminated cows have fluctuated among the selected years and for this reason,
inadequate breeding management and cow-related issues have a significant contribution. In the
study area, the majority (74.63%) of dairy cattle owners were not satisfied with AI services, and
the service is not doing well in all selected districts due to several constraints raised above.
Therefore, immediate action is required to solve the problems associated with AI services
through all responsible bodies including all governmental and non-governmental organizations
to increase the productive and reproductive performance of dairy cattle, especially indigenous
cows in terms of genetic improvement to achieve maximum benefit from this reproductive
biotechnology.